National Review and Buckley, in my estimation, have been
part of the problem for more than the thirty-five years I've been watching
them and deadly pragmatism.
Regards,
B.
-----------
Remember that NR is east coast stuffed shirt white guys.....
Make of that what you will!!
D.
-----------
Enjoyed and appreciated your commentary on National Review . Its
so called review (i.e.smear) of Innocents Betrayed is typical of that
"neo-con" publication.
National Review, which since the early 60s has consistently betrayed
the cause of freedom and our fundamental conservative principles,
has not changed and continues to be the "Trojan Horse" which
deceives and misleads so many Americans.
Joseph Sobran, Samuel Francis (who write for the Wanderer) and others
have for years attempted to alert America to the editorial duplicity
of National Review.
Many of us remember National Review (i.e. William Buckley) and the
1964 betrayal of Barry Goldwater and of Robert Welch.
Obviously National Review is still at it.
Regards,
PJC
-----------
Hi :
This is what I would expect from National Review, Mr. Buckley et
al. who also hate the John Birch Society and any true conservative
patriots (This country is full of phoney patriots and most of them
are in office). Regarding films to show, I, as a 30 some odd year
Birch member, would recommend your going up the road and getting some
of the John Birch Society videos to show regarding the bigger picture
of conspiracy to destroy our republic.
I know my section leader has recommeded 'Innocents Betrayed' as an
excellent film (he's also Jewish) and I think the big picture has
to be addressed along with gun rights as your organization is excellant
at doing as the premiere gun rights organization in the country (I
don't trust the NRA any more since they've stood still for gun controls
and increases in size of government).
I wish to urge you to read the 'Blue Book ' of the John Birch Society
and check out www.jbs.org www.getusout.org ( www.stoptheftaa.org -
IMPORTANT CURRENT PROJECT that the present administration is trying
to SNEAK through congress to erase our borders and ship out the rest
of our jobs and industry and destroy our country) . Well so long for
now and keep up the good work
Sincerely,
EN
-----------
We should not be surprised that the right will oppose freedom. They
do it all the time.
It seems when you get extreme left you find Communists when you get
extreme right you find Nazis.
Who was it who said; when you are downtrodden it does not matter
whether it is a right boot or a left boot that is on your neck?
For liberty,
JH
-----------
You're right: this article in NR was a pointless put-down, and it
makes me wonder who's in charge over there these days.
I subscribed to National Review for a number of years, but its relentlessly
negative tone finally got to me. Fifteen years ago (approximately),
I dropped my subscription. A person can hear and read all the relentless
bitching and whining he needs on the TV networks and major wire services.
Thank you for being an unabashed voice for freedom. I will soon become
a member of JPFO.
SM
-----------
I stopped reading National Review years ago!!!!!! I don't really
consider them conservative. Innocents Betrayed is an excellent film.
My friend and medical partner is Jewish and conservative I have showed
him many items from JPFO and he has enjoyed and liked them all. He
wants to see I.B. I figure I'll get a better response than National
Review gave you. I'm disappointed in NR but not surprized.
Happy New Year
DM
-----------
Gentlemen,
I believe you may have misconstrued the comments by the reviewer
from the National Review.
He commented on your premise: "...that gun control inevitably
leads to state-sponsored mass murder.", and then stated "(_Innocents
Betrayed_, I later learned, was produced by the Wisconsin-based Jews
for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership. Make of that what you will.)"
Your response was: "The reviewer made a special point of sneaking
in some anti-Semitism into his review. The film was produced by JPFO,
he notes and then adds: "Make of that what you will."
I am not convinced that the author's remarks were anti-Semitic, but
rather aimed at "GUN CONTROL" inevitably leads to state-sponsored
mass murder", and then adding, sarcastically, that your organization
is Jews "FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP". I
think his knock was that your organization supports gun ownership,
rather than its being Jewish.
Unfortunately, not all "conservatives" support that right
the way we do. It is regrettable that so many so-called "educated
people" do not understand the historic connection between gun
control and absolute tyranny. (Before there were guns, tyrants banned
the private ownership of swords, and even knives longer than a few
inches).
Your hard-earned sensitivity to implied anti-Semitism, in this case,
may have led you astray.
Please note that I make these remarks without having seen the rest
of the article.
May you be blessed with success in the coming New Year.
FC
-----------
National review and Buckley have been RINO/neocons for decades.
R.
