Be sure you are signed up for JPFO's periodical Email Alerts.


Get a very aggressive defense of your rights.

Membership Page

Time to Relax?!

Go Try
'Chill-Out' Corner



Since the "New Look" change mid 2011 - we are still thirsty for feedback but sadly get very little. Can we ask for one or two regular visitors to volunteer to regularly report, mentioning any link or display problems, and Email us with info. Some errors can be hard to track down and so outside help is most useful.

"Gun of the week" has been running for some time - let’s hear from you. Like - not like? Any other suggestions?

Thank you - JPFO Webmaster.

Click on the above.
Help us avoid errors.

Should you prefer a full page of JPFO’s main links, then
Go Here.

JPFO Order Line
(800) 869-1884.

Alerts & "Bounces"
Points to note with the JPFO alert emails.

Alerts can sometimes bounce!

Note - (July 2011) We notice sometimes that out of the thousands of alerts sent out, there can be rather high numbers of "bounces" - on checking with our provider it would seem that now and again an ISP makes some change to their email settings and that can result in non-delivery to those using that ISP.

If it happens to be something like Hotmail, Yahoo or even gmail - then many can be affected temporarily. For those who miss out on one of our sendings, we apologize, but the provider does try to stay ahead of things when they can by making changes in their own settings to reflect ISP changes and so control the bounces, which we like to see as zero!

If in doubt, please check the alerts archive to make sure you have not missed anything. Also, if you get alerts do please open them!

Chris, Webmaster.

Why Join?
Why you should consider joining JPFO.

Why Join JPFO?

JPFO tries to be an educator by supplying "intellectual ammunition" - the idea being that we provide information for folks to use the best they can, to further the fight against "Gun Control". We are tax exempt and cannot lobby or endorse but, for sure we can give you the fodder you need such that you can do your bit the best way you can. The fight to preserve our 2A is vital.

Researching to find data, writing articles, as well maintaining the site - all takes time and expense and so, help towards keeping this active and vital is essential. We would encourage anyone who finds our efforts worthwhile to become a member, or even donate - it all helps us survive and continue the hard fought battle.

Please dig deep, use the search, explore through our menus - find even old pages and pass them on. Dissemination of material is invaluable.

NRA Grades Candidates on the Curve



Archived from


NRA grades candidates on the curve
May 5, 9:36 PM - Fort Smith Gun Rights Examiner - Steve D. Jones

Kevin R. Holmes

I had an NRA Political Victory Fund mailer forwarded to me today, one which announced they had graded the candidates for Arkansas House District 66 and was endorsing one of the candidates. I received this email after recently reading an open letter to Ted Nugent by the group Jews for the Preservation of Firearms, so I was naturally “on-guard” about the contents of the NRA’s suggestion.

The mailer stated the NRA-PVF was grading Kevin Holmes at an AQ rating (the “Q” stands for graded on questionnaire only) and was endorsing him for election to the seat. I then went to the PVF website and found they had graded opponent Gary Deffenbaugh at a B-. However, the PVF does not publish the answers candidates give on these questionnaires.

AQ A pro-gun candidate whose rating is based solely on the candidate’s responses to the NRA-PVF Candidate Questionnaire and who does not have a voting record on Second Amendment issues.

B A generally pro-gun candidate. However, a “B” candidate may have opposed some pro-gun reform or supported some restrictive legislation in the past.

Why should this concern me? Several reasons come to mind, and all of them are connected to questionnaires the gun rights group Arkansas Carry sent out to both candidates earlier this year. Here are some examples of Kevin Holmes’s answers:

At this point, I would not support completely restoring open carry rights similar to those currently allowed in Vermont.

This answer may exactly match what the NRA wants in a candidate, based upon their lack of support for this gun right.

… I would support legislation that allows employers to make decisions whether to allow employee's the right to store firearms in their vehicles…

Anyone familiar with the NRA’s extended battle in Oklahoma over employee’s rights to possess firearms in their vehicles in an employer’s parking lot knows this viewpoint is completely against what the NRA stands for. How could the PVF give a candidate who has never voted on gun legislation an A rating with an anti-gun rights stance such as this? Holmes goes on to say in the questionnaire:

I believe the term "God-given right to self-defense" is not specifically included in the Heller decision, and I do not believe that the 2nd Amendment affirms a right to self-defense. I believe the 2nd Amendment gives our Country's citizens the right to keep and bear arms. I do not agree that the 2nd Amendment was extended in Heller to a specific right of self-defense, nor should it be. The decision to defend yourself or someone else from attack (and potentially take someone else's life in the process) should be reviewed on a case by case basis.

I would have to discuss these statements at length with Kevin Holmes to exactly understand his point on the Heller decision.

Gary Deffenbaugh

Gary Deffenbaugh answered the Arkansas Carry questionnaire with mostly brief statements. Arkansas Carry does not grade candidates; however, Deffenbaugh’s answers show him to be a definite pro-gun candidate. His answer to the question of support for open carry is questionable, but not in opposition, either:

I think churches and private businesses should be able to control what they do on their own property, but schools should be allowed have a more restrictive format. I would support that.

Deffenbaugh does say later in the questionnaire he would consider sponsoring open carry legislation.

Would the real pro-gun candidate please stand up? The NRA is no help here; in fact, without any real facts (such as the answers to the questionnaire submitted), voters should throw out the suggestion by NRA-PVR.

I suggest voters contact both candidates with any questions they have about their stance on gun issues. Read the Arkansas Carry questionnaires carefully and match them with the answers you personally get from the candidates. However you do it, vote pro-gun rights!

For more commentary, make the online journal, The War onGuns: Notes from the Resistance a daily stop.


Back to Top