Be sure you are signed up for JPFO's periodical Email Alerts.
JOIN JPFO TODAY
Get a very aggressive defense of your rights.
Click on the above.
Help us avoid errors.
Should you prefer a full page of JPFO’s main links, then
Read these classic
rebuttals to "Gun Control"
Since the Newtown, Connecticut shooting, the anti-gun mafia has been out in full force, inclusive of the lamestream media talking heads, governors, mayors, legislators -- state and federal, special interest groups like Sarah Brady's foaming-at-the-mouth anti-2nd Amendment bunch, and Hollywood weirdoes, to say nothing of the Marxist in the White House; the group Mayors Against Illegal Guns has sprung forth with a PSA -- public service announcement -- in which a plethora of Hollyweird types appear, calling on Washington to come up with a "gun control plan." There's a reason I don't support the Hollyweird industry -- actors may have money, they may have media presence, they may wine and dine with the elite; but, for the most part, they haven't got the common sense God gave a goose.
All these people want to take away the right of Americans to keep and bear arms. To see just how lacking these people are – in common sense, the ability to think and reason with any degree of logic – take a look at this website where the editor, a rabid anti-gunner, is aiding and abetting the cause by helping criminals identify homes of law-abiding citizens where they might be able to steal a gun.
People who don't learn from history are bound to repeat it.
We have a Marxist in the White House who would like nothing better than to seize all guns, thereby leaving the American people defenseless against government tyranny. Stalin, Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini were all able to seize power because the people were defenseless to do anything about it.
What do Stalin, Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini have in common with the Marxist in the White House? They were all Marxists too, of one shade or another, whether fascist, national socialist (Nazi), or communist.There are two things that all of these anti-gunners carefully avoid in the discussion of the right to keep and bear arms.
1) Laws are not made for criminals because criminals don't obey laws anyway. This makes it very apparent that restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens won't stop criminals from shooting up malls, churches, schools, theaters, etc.
2) If the intent is to kill, most anything can be used to accomplish the desired end, including water. In China, recently, a man with a knife stabbed 22 school children.
That the anti-gun mafia continues to advocate the termination of the right to keep and bear arms, makes their agenda very clear -- they want to disarm the American people and leave them defenseless against government tyranny.
People who do not learn from history are bound to repeat it.
And history tells us that the very first people purged by despots who have seized power, are those who helped them seize power. Stalin did it; Lenin did it; Mussolini did it; Hitler also did it.
Why were these the first people to be lined up and executed? Because people who are so easily led, who truly believe in the presumptive cause, are blind to the real agenda of the despot; and once they discover they have been used against their own self-interest, they become the worst enemy of the despot, for there is a very fine line between absolute love and absolute hate. When people figure out they have been used, absolute love turns to absolute hate and these people become very dangerous to the despot.
And those who helped Stalin, Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler seize power were people just like those now wanting to take away the right of every American to keep and bear arms.
Are these people really so stupid that they truly believe that the way of the despot won't happen this time, if they get their way?
Unfortunately, this class of people never seem to stop to think until it's too late. Only when they realize the threat to their own self-interest do they realize they've been duped and used.
The anti-gunners couch their argument in terms of being enlightened, progressive, civilized; but they are anything but enlightened; progressive and communist are synonymous; as for being civilized, being ignorant isn't being civilized. A civilized society is one that adheres to a moral code that reaches across the society, as a whole, binding the citizens together under a common standard.
As established, America held to such a moral code, and prospered. In America, today, no such moral code exists.
In America today, brought on by those who call themselves enlightened, progressive, civilized, there is no right and wrong, no moral standard, everything is continually in flux. Under such a society, the advocate can justify every decadent behavior as a "right" while disparaging a moral code as "old fashioned" and archaic. America has, for the past sixty years, taken on the persona of Sodom and Gomorrah.
People who do not learn from history are bound to repeat it.
We can look at what happened to like societies of the past -- the worst being the Roman Empire where every kind of decadent behavior was encouraged and practiced openly, until the society imploded due to moral decadence.
Will America be any different? No. We are watching, due to the moral decay of our society, increased violence, increased crime, increased sexual deviance, increased sexual decadence. No society has for long withstood moral decadence for with such moral decadence comes economic regression and the welfare state, exactly where America stands today.
Paul Harvey had it right when he said that things in America would only get better when the morals of the people got better.
To every anti-gunner, I have this to say -- I will give up my right to keep and bear arms only after every gun is confiscated from every Secret Service Agent, every member of the military, every elected representative, every federal and state law enforcement official, every cop, every police officer, every peace officer, every security guard, every government agent and bureaucrat, and every criminal.
The right to keep and bear arms is not about anyone's "hunting rifle"; the right to keep and bear arms is about the right of the people to defend themselves against anyone who would attempt the taking of their rights.
What stands between the Marxist in the White House and tyranny is the right of every American to keep and bear arms.
Two hundred and thirty-six years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, our Founding Fathers are still more intelligent and have more common sense than the anti-gun crowd. But then they knew, having suffered the tyranny of King George, that the right to keep and bear arms was imperative to the God-given right of every man, woman and child to be free of evil tyrants who walk among us.
© 2013 Lynn M. Stuter -- All Rights Reserved
Activist and researcher, Stuter has spent the last fifteen years researching systems theory and systems philosophy with a particular emphasis on education as it pertains to achieving the sustainable global environment. She home schooled two daughters. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance, the sustainable global environment and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and a growing body of citizens concerned about the transformation of our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a participatory democracy. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: www.learn-usa.com