April 15th 2013

Drones, guns and the president


Judge Andrew Napolitano takes a close look at the contrast between a goverment that claims to have a lawful power to kill, but then seeks to restrict people's ability to defend themselves against aggressors out to kill. Do they work for us, or is it vice-versa?

He brings up aspects of our constitution as well as pointing out the simple fact that we have a President who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Instead, we see the forces of legislation being utilized to enable more control over our rights -- in particular those innate rights to self-defense. Read "Drones, guns and the president" and the Judge's words of judicial wisdom.

Refer to the "Sandy Hook Index" for an archive collection of valuable material we have shown since the events at the Newtown Elementary School.

Check out Gun/Murder Statistics: A set of tabulated and graphical data showing relationships between gun numbers and murders - categorized by alphabetical countries listing. Useful research material.

"… their real goal isn't disarming the criminals but disarming everyone they view as potential political opposition. Some segments of gun control are aimed at producing a local electoral majority, the prime example being the Colorado bills that would cause enough pro-gun people to move out of the state to ensure a long-term Democrat majority. Others are aimed at disarming the "most probably enemy" population groups, and both political parties are guilty of that to some extent, though the Democratic party does it far more."

Yours in Freedom, The Liberty Crew at JPFO
Protecting you by creating solutions to destroy "gun control"

Get your JPFO bumper stickers -- these are nominal size 3¾ x 7 ½.
The latest one is the Nazi Gun Control sticker, the other is stating
"Gun Control" is NOT Kosher. Click on a thumbnail to visit the JPFO Store.

Back to Top




The JPFO Store

Films and CDs